Examines how empagliflozin reduces apoptosis in pancreatic β-cells, suggesting new treatment pathways for diabetes.
Background Progressive loss of pancreatic β-cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is linked to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress–induced apoptosis. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have glucose-lowering and potential cytoprotective effects. We investigated whether empagliflozin protects β-cells from ER stress–mediated apoptosis and the underlying pathway. Methods Mouse Beta-TC-6 (BTC-6) and hamster HIT-T15 pancreatic β-cell lines were exposed to tunicamycin (5 or 10μg/mL) to induce ER stress, with or without empagliflozin (10 -8 , 10 -9 , 10 -10 M). SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 mRNA were assessed by RT-qPCR. Expression of ER stress markers ( GRP-94 , BiP , PERK , eIF-2α , IRE-1 , ATF-4 , CHOP ) was measured by RT-qPCR; eIF-2α, phospho-eIF-2α and CHOP protein levels were analyzed by Western blot. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were quantified by XTT and Annexin V-FITC assays. Results BTC-6 cells expressed SGLT-1 but not SGLT-2 . Empagliflozin (10 -8 and 10 -9 M) increased BTC-6 proliferation (p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively). Tunicamycin caused significant apoptosis after 48h (p<0.001). Co-treatment with empagliflozin (10 -8 , 10 -9 M) significantly reduced tunicamycin-induced apoptosis, especially at 5μg/ml tunicamycin (p<0.01). Empagliflozin co-incubation lowered PERK , eIF-2α , IRE-1α and CHOP mRNA levels versus tunicamycin alone (all p<0.05), and decreased phospho-eIF-2α (p<0.01) and CHOP (p<0.05) protein levels. Similar anti-apoptotic effects were observed in HIT-T15 cells. Conclusions Empagliflozin enhances β-cell proliferation and attenuates ER stress–induced apoptosis in vitro , primarily via downregulation of the PERK–eIF-2α–CHOP pathway. These findings support further investigation of SGLT-2 inhibitors for preservation of β-cell survival and function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasiri‐Ansari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: