Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines mechanical parameters in slope excavation, suggesting efficient predictive modeling methods.
Reliable mechanical parameters are needed to predict deformation during staged slope excavation, yet deep inclinometer profiles are high-dimensional and repeated numerical inversion is costly. This study integrates principal component analysis, Gaussian process regression (GPR), and sequential Bayesian updating to infer six effective parameters from multi-stage horizontal displacement profiles of a highway slope in Shaoyang, China. FLAC3D simulations were performed for a 120-point Latin hypercube design. Three principal components explained over 99% of profile variance. Ten repetitions of five-fold cross-validation yielded mean PCA–GPR R2 values of 0.9769–0.9945. Empirical coverages of the 95% marginal prediction intervals ranged from 93.2% to 96.0%, and the GPR predictive covariance was included in the likelihood. Truncated multivariate Gaussian approximations were used to transfer posterior means and covariance structures between excavation stages. A five-strategy comparison showed that adding Stage 3 reduced parameter standard deviations by 10.0–22.0%, followed by a further 11.1–32.2% reduction after Stage 4. Sensitivity and posterior-contraction analyses indicated stronger constraints on the stiffness parameters, whereas ϕ2 remained weakly identifiable. The final posterior means reproduced the spatially held-out, within-site CX-2 profile with a mean absolute error of 0.18 mm. The framework quantifies the parameter-specific information gained from complete profiles across excavation stages; its findings remain conditional on the monitored site and the adopted modeling and error assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: