Key result
Only ~3% of cardiac rehab participants meet 24-hour movement guidelines, with compliance linked to better QoL.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation participants have specific characteristics that may influence adherence to the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and their relationship with quality of life.
Does adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines improve quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=105)
Yes
Does adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines improve quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation participants?
Very few cardiac rehabilitation participants meet all 24-hour movement guidelines, but higher physical activity and lower sedentary time are associated with better quality of life, highlighting the need to target these behaviors outside supervised sessions.
Low adherence suggests intervention targets in cardiac rehab; leaves open causal effects on quality of life.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines integrate recommendations on physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), and sleep. Individuals in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) have specific characteristics that may influence adherence to these 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and their relationship with quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of CRP participants who meet the recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and to evaluate the association between levels of PA, SB, and sleep duration with the quality-of-life domains of these individuals. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study including CRP participants (mean age: 68.46 ± 10.15 years; 58.1% with coronary artery disease). Quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Movement behaviors (PA, SB, and sleep) were measured by accelerometers. Compliance with the guidelines was described using percentage values. Associations between PA, SB, and sleep with quality-of-life domains were analyzed using quantile regression. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Among the 105 participants analyzed, only 2.9% simultaneously met all three recommendations. Individual adherence was 29.5% (PA), 9.5% (SB), and 34.3% (sleep). A negative association was identified between SB and functional capacity, and positive associations were found between PA and the domains of functional capacity, vitality, and social aspects. Sleep duration was not associated with quality-of-life domains. DISCUSSION: Few CRP participants simultaneously meet all three recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines, with partial adherence being more frequent. Higher levels of PA and lower time spent in SB were associated with better quality of life, whereas sleep duration showed no significant association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soares et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors (n=105). Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines adherence vs. Non-adherence was evaluated on Simultaneous adherence to all three recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep). Only 2.9% of cardiac rehabilitation program participants simultaneously met all three recommendations of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines, while higher physical activity and lower sedentary behavior were associated with better quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: