Evaluates hypoxia-related signatures and PRMT5 to determine radiation resistance in head and neck cancer, suggesting new treatment strategies.
Tumor hypoxia is known to play a crucial role in the progression and treatment resistance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of hypoxia-related gene signatures and to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying radiation resistance. Patients with HNSCC were divided into hypoxia-related low-risk (hypoxia-LR; n = 198) and high-risk (hypoxia-HR; n = 316) subgroups based on hypoxia-associated gene expression profiles. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses, and the hypoxia-related signature was validated across three independent cohorts. Additionally, Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways associated with radiation resistance, with a particular focus on post-translational modifications. The hypoxia-HR subgroup showed significantly poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rates than the hypoxia-LR subgroup ( p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). The hypoxia-related signature remained an independent prognostic factor regardless of HPV status and showed a strong correlation with radiotherapy response. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of post-translational modification processes, highlighting protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a key regulator. Functional experiments demonstrated that PRMT5 inhibition abolished radiation resistance in resistant HNSCC cell lines, whereas PRMT5 overexpression conferred resistance in standard cell lines. Both hypoxia-related molecular signatures and PRMT5 expression play critical roles in determining radiation response and prognosis in HNSCC. Targeting PRMT5 in conjunction with hypoxia-related biomarkers may enable personalized therapeutic strategies to enhance radiotherapy efficacy in head and neck cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: