Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores multimodal entity linking performance in structured knowledge bases, suggesting enhanced disambiguation through collaboration.
Multimodal entity linking (MEL) grounds entity mentions in text-image contexts to entries in a structured knowledge base; however, most existing systems still decompose a multimodal document into independent mention-level decisions. This formulation overlooks a central tension of real-world MEL: the evidence needed to disambiguate an ambiguous mention is often distributed across co-occurring mentions, visual context, and cross-modal consistency, rather than being contained in the mention itself. To address this limitation, we propose Collaborative Entity Linking through Multichannel Interaction (CELMI), a four-channel framework that jointly models textual semantics, visual perception, cross-modal alignment, and inter-mention collaboration. CELMI employs dual-level textual alignment, text-guided visual gating, learned cross-modal projection, and attention-based entity graph propagation. To stabilize joint optimization, we further introduce a multi-channel consistency objective that combines per-channel contrastive losses with an overall ranking loss, reducing channel dominance and representation collapse. Among conventional non-LLM/VLM MEL models, CELMI achieves the strongest MRR and Hits@1 performance on WikiMEL, RichpediaMEL, and WikiDiverse, with Hits@1 scores of 89.03% on WikiMEL and 83.02% on RichpediaMEL; LLM/VLM systems remain stronger on WikiDiverse, positioning CELMI as a lightweight complement. Progressive stress ablation shows a 38.50 percentage-point absolute Hits@1 drop when the architecture is reduced to a single unimodal endpoint, confirming that the gains arise from synergistic channel interaction rather than isolated module effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: