Key result
Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement after failed edge-to-edge repair was feasible, with 0% periprocedural complications compared to 5.6% for primary TTVR (P=0.99).
Why the study?
Residual or recurrent TR occurs in about 12% of patients within 1 year of T-TEER, surgical options are high-risk, and data regarding the feasibility, safety, and treatment strategies of TTVR after T-TEER are sparse.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) after failed T-TEER have similar procedural success and safety compared to primary TTVR in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=21)
No
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) after failed T-TEER have similar procedural success and safety compared to primary TTVR in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is feasible and appears to have a similar safety and procedural success profile to primary TTVR.
BACKGROUND: Residual or recurrent tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after prior transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge (T-TEER) repair occurs in about 12% of patients within 1 year. Since surgical tricuspid valve repair or replacement is of high risk, treatment options remain scarce. Data regarding the feasibility, safety, and treatment strategies using transcatheter valve replacement (TTVR) after T-TEER are sparse. AIMS: Here, we aimed to summarize our early experience in TTVR after failed T-TEER, analyze its feasibility and summarize the results in a distinct algorithm. METHODS: Patients undergoing TTVR (n = 21) at the University Hospital of Duesseldorf were prospectively analyzed and stratified according prior T-TEER procedures with implanted devices. Groups were compared in terms of procedural success, periprocedural complications, and patient outcomes. Individual treatment decisions for patients after T-TEER were analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients had residual/recurrent severe to torrential TR and underwent TTVR after T-TEER, whereas 16 patients were primarily referred for TTVR. Preprocedural wire-based intentional clip excision (WICE) was performed in 60% of these patients. Patients did not differ regarding procedural success (100% in both groups, p = 0.99) and periprocedural complications (0 [TTVR after TEER] vs. 5.6% [primary TTVR], p = 0.99 for the combined endpoint of in-hospital death, stroke, myocardial infarction, re-intervention or surgery, and major bleeding). A pacemaker was required in one patient of each group, p = 0.4). Procedural times were higher among patients with prior T-TEER. Treatment decisions for patients after T-TEER were integrated into a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSION: The valve after clip concept is feasible and the proposed algorithm may support procedural planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voß et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=21). Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) after T-TEER vs. Primary TTVR was evaluated on Combined endpoint of in-hospital death, stroke, myocardial infarction, re-intervention or surgery, and major bleeding (p=0.99). Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement after failed edge-to-edge repair was feasible, with 0% periprocedural complications compared to 5.6% for primary TTVR (P=0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: