Systematic literature review finds work-life programs impact employee outcomes, highlighting research gaps.
Work-life balance is a major concern in the architecture, engineering, and construction industries. Despite growing interest, research remains fragmented, with limited insights into how work-life programs designed to support employees influence work-life balance and work outcomes. Drawing on the input-process-output framework, we develop an integrated conceptual framework of program availability, work-life balance, and work outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted using Business Source Elite, ABI/INFORM, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo, which yielded 41 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2025. Findings reveal that research to date has focused more on employee-level dynamics than on the organizational antecedents and implementation of work-life programs. Strong evidence exists for factors that can lead to work-life balance or work-life conflict, with growing evidence for their subsequent effects on employee outcomes. The findings present a consolidated evidence-based framework to guide theory development and inform effective work-life balance practices within the architecture, engineering, and construction sector. The framework offers organizations a roadmap for implementing sustainable work-life practices that enhance employee well-being and provides a systematic mapping of the literature, showing where research is clustered and where further theoretical and empirical development is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langdon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: