Randomized trial evaluates online simulation and face-to-face training effectiveness in midwifery students, indicating a viable alternative for skill development.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of synchronous online simulation compared with face-to-face instruction in teaching episiotomy repair skills to midwifery students. It also assessed learning satisfaction and self-confidence. A randomized controlled study was conducted with undergraduate students enrolled in a childbirth course. Participants were randomly assigned to either a synchronous online or face-to-face training group. Both groups received structured instruction using standardized simulation models. Outcomes were measured using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale and the Episiotomy Skill Evaluation Form. Both training formats resulted in similarly high levels of skill performance. The online group demonstrated significantly higher self-confidence and overall learning satisfaction, while skill outcomes were comparable between groups. No significant associations were found between demographic characteristics and study outcomes. Synchronous online simulation is a feasible and effective alternative to face-to-face training for developing procedural skills while also enhancing learner confidence and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nihal Aydın (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: