Optimization framework demonstrates cost-effective hydrogen production and transport from Africa to Europe, highlighting renewable energy potential.
This paper presents an optimization framework for green hydrogen (GH) production, which integrates the operation of subsystems consisting of photovoltaic generation, reverse-osmosis desalination, proton exchange membrane electrolysis, and battery energy storage for continuous operation under solar intermittency. A two-step Ordinal Optimization (OO) method is used to explore efficiently the large design search space and identify subsystem sizes that minimize the levelized cost of hydrogen ($/kg), including production, storage, and transportation. First, the designs are evaluated using a simple but computationally efficient model based on a two-week simulation. The evaluated designs are then scaled to a yearly operation and ranked by increasing hydrogen costs. Second, the top-S designs are reevaluated using an accurate annual simulation model. OO theory predicts the number of top-S designs that need to be evaluated accurately to ensure that the optimum is included with a 95% alignment probability. This framework was applied to case studies for producing GH for local use in Tunis at a cost of $2.945, and for shipping to Genoa, Italy, and to Hamburg, Germany, at costs of $3.902 and $6.382 per kg, respectively. The study leverages the potential of renewable energy (RE) production in Tunis and its proximity to Europe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: