Shows chaotic discretization optimizes combinatorial problems, indicating improved performance.
The transition from continuous swarm intelligence algorithms to discrete combinatorial domains remains a critical challenge in bio-inspired computing. Traditional binarization techniques frequently induce premature convergence in highly constrained landscapes. This paper presents a chaotic discretization framework that replaces the classical behavior of the two-step binarization technique to regulate the balance between exploration and exploitation. The proposal systematically integrates three leading continuous metaheuristics in the literature, with twenty-four binarization configurations, across three distinct NP-hard problem archetypes: capacity-constrained (0–1 Knapsack), sparse (Set Covering), and mathematically degenerate flat landscapes (Unicost Set Covering). Nonparametric statistical tests confirm that chaotic discretization acts as a powerful regulator in the landscape (p < 0.05). Empirical evidence shows that the highest-performing chaotic mapping is heavily influenced by the specific landscape morphology evaluated: the 0–1 Knapsack Problem is statistically optimized by the Circle map under standard rules; the Set Covering Problem achieves optimal median performance with the Tent map under elitist formulations, although severe matrix constraints ultimately force statistical ties; and the Unicost Set Covering Problem utilizes the nonlinear sequences of the sinusoidal map under complementary operators to break convergence stagnation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cisternas-Caneo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: