Randomized trial evaluates measurement accuracy in buttress threads, suggesting it offers practical efficiency.
This research evaluates the accuracy and repeatability of a novel procedure for measuring pitch diameter using a touch-trigger probe in a production environment. Experiments were performed on a WFL M40 machine equipped with a Renishaw RMP600 strain gauge probe, using different thread types and machine tools. The results were validated by comparison with the traditional three-wire method, which is regarded as a high-precision reference for pitch diameter measurement. Statistical analyses, including the Shapiro–Wilk test, ANOVA, and Tukey HSD post hoc tests, were applied to assess error distribution and differences between thread types and machines. The proposed method demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and repeatability, with an error spread of approximately ±0.015 mm, achieving measurement results within the manufacturing tolerance range (±0.07 mm). The study also showed that measurement accuracy is influenced by factors such as thread angle and Z-axis positioning. Overall, the method proved to be reliable for production use, offering a good balance between measurement accuracy and operational efficiency, although minor adjustments may be needed for automatic correction routines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krawczyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: