Why the study?
Does 2D transthoracic simultaneous multiplane imaging (SMPI) reliably assess ASD dimensions and rim size compared to 2D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial septal defect?
Does 2D transthoracic simultaneous multiplane imaging (SMPI) reliably assess ASD dimensions and rim size compared to 2D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial septal defect?
2D transthoracic simultaneous multiplane imaging can reliably assess secundum ASD dimensions and rim size for pre-interventional selection, potentially replacing TEE.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the value of two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic simultaneous multiplane imaging (SMPI) in the evaluation of suitability for percutaneous atrial septal secundum defect (ASD) closure compared with the golden standard 2D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with an ASD underwent both SMPI and TEE. Ten patients (34%) were male (age 41 ± 18 years, range 20-74). SMPI assessment of ASD size and rims included xPlane and I-rotate modes. Rims were defined as suitable for ASD percutaneous closure using a cut-off value of 5 mm. There were no significant differences between SMPI in xPlane mode and TEE regarding the sizes of the anterior-posterior dimension (13.7 ± 4.5 vs. 14.5 ± 5.2 mm) and superior-inferior dimension (13.5 ± 3.9 vs. 14.1 ± 5.0 mm, respectively). Agreement for the aortic, atrioventricular, inferior, right upper pulmonary vein, and superior rims was 100, 100, 100, 96, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The SMPI technique can reliably assess the dimensions and rim size of a secundum ASD for pre-interventional selection when compared with TEE and has thus the potential to replace TEE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGhie et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: