Why the study?
Many considerations affect the value that a new instrument or product may generate in a surgical practice.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform device purchasing decisions in otolaryngology; leaves open prospective cost-effectiveness validation.
Many considerations affect the value that a new instrument or product may generate in a surgical practice. This review serves as a guide for surgeons considering new purchases and/or wishing to advocate for hospital acquisition of new items. A summary of data from academic and industry practices is presented, with pertinent examples using relevant surgical devices such as disposable devices, laparoscopic trocars, and otologic endoscopes. Surgeons considering incorporating a new instrument or technology within their practice should weigh the following factors before decision making: patient and clinical care factors, surgeon and care team factors, and hospital factors such as cost, revenue, and sourcing. A surgeon well-versed in stakeholder interests who is involved in the purchase of a new instrument may have significant influence in value-based decision making that not only affects his or her practice but ultimately maximizes value for the patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nassiri et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: