Key result
A standardized clinical decision support tool for preoperative evaluation has been developed and distributed to over 600 clinicians to track healthcare cost and safety outcomes.
Why the study?
Over-testing and over-treatment cause excess cost and harm, making perioperative evaluation and management an opportunity to improve healthcare value.
Does a standardized clinical decision support tool improve healthcare cost and safety outcomes in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation?
Does a standardized clinical decision support tool improve healthcare cost and safety outcomes in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation?
Describes the rationale and design of a clinical decision support tool aimed at improving healthcare value and reducing over-testing in perioperative evaluation.
Distribution of preoperative decision support enables outcome tracking; leaves open effects on costs and safety.
In the United States, over testing and over treatment are recognized as the cause of both excess cost and patient harm. Healthcare value (defined as “health outcomes achieved relative to the costs of care”) has become a focus to improve the quality and affordability of healthcare. Perioperative evaluation and management of the surgical patient represents a clear opportunity to improve healthcare value. Herein, we describe the rationale for and the development of a standardized clinical decision support tool that has been distributed to over 600 clinicians performing preoperative evaluations. All patients undergoing this evaluation will be tracked, with the intent to publish both healthcare cost and safety outcomes. The use of a perioperative decision support tool is a unique approach to value in healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (2018) studied Preoperative evaluation and management. Standardized clinical decision support tool was evaluated on Healthcare cost and safety outcomes. A standardized clinical decision support tool for preoperative evaluation has been developed and distributed to over 600 clinicians to track healthcare cost and safety outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: