Why the study?
What is the effect of preoperative testing guidelines on clinical outcomes, efficiency, and cost across different countries?
What is the effect of preoperative testing guidelines on clinical outcomes, efficiency, and cost across different countries?
Preoperative testing is frequently overused and costly, highlighting the need for better adherence to and implementation of preoperative guidelines.
Preoperative testing overuse persists at high cost; confirms need for payment-linked guidelines and better implementation research.
PURPOSE: Health care institutions in many Western countries have developed preoperative testing and assessment guidelines to improve surgical outcomes and reduce cost of surgical care. The aims of this chapter are to (1) summarize the literature on the effect of preoperative testing on clinical outcomes, efficiency, and cost; and (2) to compare preoperative testing guidelines developed in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We reviewed the literature from 1975 to 2014 for studies and preoperative testing guidelines. FINDINGS: We identified 29 empirical studies and 8 country-specific guidelines for review. Most studies indicate that preoperative testing is overused and comes at a high cost. Guidelines are tied to payment only in one country studied. This is the most recent review of the literature on preoperative testing and assessment with a focus on quality of care, efficiency, and cost outcomes. In addition, this chapter provides an international comparison of preoperative guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kash et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: