Why the study?
Does a candesartan-based regimen reduce left ventricular mass index and blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Does a candesartan-based regimen reduce left ventricular mass index and blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
A candesartan-based regimen significantly reduces blood pressure and left ventricular mass index over six months in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Candesartan-based regimens were associated with LVMI and BP reductions in hypertensive LVH; hypothesis-generating, warranting randomized confirmation.
The VIPE study was a prospective, non-comparative, open-label clinical evaluation of 97 hypertensive patients (69.1% female; 68.9 +/- 9.5 years; mean blood pressure (BP) 160 +/- 12/90 +/- 9 mmHg) with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Patients were treated for six months with a candesartan-based regimen (8 mg/16 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg + additional drugs to lower BP < 140/90 mmHg). After six months, systolic/diastolic BP was decreased by 19.3 +/- 8/9.4 +/- 5 mmHg (p<0.001 for both), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) decreased 17.01 g/m2 (95%CI: -13.2 to -20.99; p<0.001). During treatment with the candesartan-based regimen all echocardiographic parameters related to LVMI were significantly reduced and 28% achieved a target LVMI [< 134 g/m(2) (men) and < 110 g/m(2) (women)]. No significant changes were observed in ejection fraction, shortening fraction or LV diastolic function. Univariate analysis showed that both age (p=0.03) and diabetes (p=0.029) were predictive of LVH regression. Thus, a candesartan-based regimen for six months significantly reduced echocardiographic LVH in hypertensive patients in general practice. The drug was very well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrios et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: