Why the study?
Current pulmonary hypertension classifications do not consider the expected interrelationship between pulmonary artery and left heart filling pressures during exercise.
Does the addition of exercise PA pulse pressure over PAWP (PP/PAWP) improve the classification of exercise hemodynamic phenotypes in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Does the addition of exercise PA pulse pressure over PAWP (PP/PAWP) improve the classification of exercise hemodynamic phenotypes in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension?
Incorporating the relationship between pulmonary artery pulse pressure and wedge pressure during exercise unmasks abnormal hemodynamic phenotypes not identified by standard resting or exercise criteria.
May refine exercise PH phenotyping; leaves open whether this improves risk stratification or therapy.
Background Resting right heart catheterization can assess both left heart filling and pulmonary artery (PA) pressures to identify and classify pulmonary hypertension. Although exercise may further elucidate hemodynamic abnormalities, current pulmonary hypertension classifications do not consider the expected interrelationship between PA and left heart filling pressures. This study explored the utility of this relationship to enhance the classification of exercise hemodynamic phenotypes in pulmonary hypertension. Methods and Results Data from 36 healthy individuals (55, 50-60 years, 50% male) and 85 consecutive patients (60, 49-71 years, 48% male) with dyspnea and/or suspected pulmonary hypertension of uncertain etiology were analyzed. Right heart catheterization was performed at rest and during semiupright submaximal cycling. To classify exercise phenotypes in patients, upper 95% CIs were identified from the healthy individuals for the change from rest to exercise in mean PA pressure over cardiac output (ΔmPAP/ΔCO ≤3.2 Wood units [WU]), pulmonary artery wedge pressure over CO (ΔPAWP/ΔCO ≤2 mm Hg/L per minute), and exercise PA pulse pressure over PAWP (PP/PAWP ≤2.5). Among patients with a ΔmPAP/ΔCO ≤3.2 WU, the majority (84%) demonstrated a ΔPAWP/ΔCO ≤2 mm Hg/L per minute, yet 23% demonstrated an exercise PP/PAWP >2.5. Among patients with a ΔmPAP/ΔCO >3.2 WU, 37% had an exercise PP/PAWP >2.5 split between ΔPAWP/ΔCO groups. Patients with normal hemodynamic classification declined from 52% at rest to 36% with exercise. Conclusions The addition of PP/PAWP to classify exercise hemodynamics uncovers previously unrecognized abnormal phenotypes within each ΔmPAP/ΔCO group. Our study refines abnormal exercise hemodynamic phenotypes based on an understanding of the interrelationship between PA and left heart filling pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bentley et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: