This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The present work elucidates about the structure of bioactive glasses having chemical compositions expressed as (mol %) (50.0 – x )SiO 2 – x B 2 O 3 –9.3Na 2 O–37CaO–3.7P 2 O 5, where x = 0.0, 12.5, 25, and 37.5, and establishes a correlation between the structure and thermal stability. The structural modifications in the parent boron-free glass (B0) with the gradual substitutions of B 2 O 3 for SiO 2 are assessed by Raman and 29 Si, 31 P, 11 B, and 23 Na magic angle spinning (MAS)-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopies. The structural studies reveal the presence of Q Si 2 and Q Si 3 structural units in both silicate and borosilicate glasses. However, Q Si 4 (3B) units additionally form upon incorporating B 2 O 3 in B0 glass. B-containing silicate glasses exhibit both three-coordinated boron (B III ) and four-coordinated boron (B IV ) units. The 31 P MAS-NMR studies reveal that the majority of phosphate species exist as isolated orthophosphate (Q P 0 ) units. The incorporation of B 2 O 3 in B0 glass increases the cross-linking between the SiO 4 and BO 4 structural units. However, incorporation of B 2 O 3 lowers the glass thermal stability (Δ T ), as shown by differential scanning calorimetry. Although both silicate and borosilicate glasses exhibit good in vitro apatite-forming ability and cell compatibility, the bactericidal action against Escherichia coli bacteria is more evident in borosilicate glass in comparison to silicate base glass. The controlled release of (BO 3 ) 3– ions from boron-modified bioactive glasses improves both the cell proliferation and the antibacterial properties, making them promising for hard tissue engineering applications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasad et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: