Key result
Bisoprolol initiation in hemodialysis patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.73) and MACEs (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.91) relative to carvedilol.
Why the study?
Despite widespread use, there is no trial evidence comparing the relative safety and efficacy of beta-blockers in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Does bisoprolol reduce all-cause mortality and MACEs compared to carvedilol in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
Cohort (n=20,476)
Does bisoprolol reduce all-cause mortality and MACEs compared to carvedilol in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
Hazard Ratio: 0.66 (95% CI 0.6–0.73)
In patients on maintenance hemodialysis, initiating bisoprolol rather than carvedilol is associated with a significantly lower 2-year risk of all-cause mortality and MACEs.
May inform beta-blocker choice in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use, there is no trial evidence to inform β-blocker's (BB) relative safety and efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We herein compare health outcomes associated with carvedilol or bisoprolol use, the most commonly prescribed BBs in these patients. METHODS: We created a cohort study of 9305 HD patients who initiated bisoprolol and 11 171 HD patients who initiated carvedilol treatment between 2004 and 2011. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between carvedilol and bisoprolol users during a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Bisoprolol initiators were younger, had shorter dialysis vintage, were women, had common comorbidities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and were receiving statins and antiplatelets, but they had less heart failure and digoxin prescriptions than carvedilol initiators. During our observations, 1555 deaths and 5167 MACEs were recorded. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox model, bisoprolol initiation was associated with a lower all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.73]} compared with carvedilol initiation. After accounting for the competing risk of death, bisoprolol use (versus carvedilol) was associated with a lower risk of MACEs [HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.91)] and attributed to a lower risk of heart failure [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)] and ischemic stroke [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.97)], but not to differences in the risk of acute myocardial infarction [HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.15)]. Results were confirmed in propensity score matching analyses, stratified analyses and analyses that considered prescribed dosages or censored patients discontinuing or switching BBs. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to carvedilol, bisoprolol initiation by HD patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of death and MACEs, mainly attributed to lower heart failure and ischemic stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Hemodialysis (n=20,476). Bisoprolol vs. Carvedilol was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.73). Bisoprolol initiation in hemodialysis patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.73) and MACEs (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.91) relative to carvedilol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: