Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have previously demonstrated that the von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), used in the diagnosis of vonWillebrand disease (VWD), can be accurately determined via ELISA by measuring the ristocetin-induced binding of VWF to a captured recombinant fragment of GPIbalpha (rfGPIbalpha, AA 1-289) (Vanhoorelbeke et al., Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 107-13). This ELISA is more reliable than the currently used platelet agglutination test. Normal plasma contains relatively high concentrations of glycocalicin, a proteolytic fragment of GPIbalpha. We therefore studied whether non-purified plasma glycocalicin can replace rfGPIbalpha in our ELISA. Of 42 anti-GPIbalpha monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) capable of binding plasma glycocalicin, only one MAb captured glycocalicin in a spatial orientation exposing the VWF-binding site in glycocalicin, allowing a specific and dose-dependent ristocetin-mediated VWF-binding. Intra- and interassay variability were comparable with those for the rfGPIbalpha based VWF:RCo ELISA. The VWF:RCo activity of plasma from 33 normal individuals, 19 type 1, 16 type 2A, 9 type 2B, 8 type 2M and 7 type 3VWD patients was determined with this ELISA and allowed a clear identification of VWD patients. Furthermore, determination of the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio resulted in the discrimination between type 1 and type 2 VWD patients. Results for the glycocalicin based and the rfGPIbalpha based VWF:RCo ELISAs were in good agreement (r=0.943). There was also a good correlation between the glycocalicin based ELISA and the standard platelet agglutination test (r=0.963). In conclusion, to diagnose VWD, a VWF:RCo ELISA based on antibody immobilized plasma glycocalicin can be performed reliably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pareyn et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: