Key result
Two-dimensional strain imaging distinguished hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive LVH and athlete's heart.
Why the study?
Does two-dimensional strain imaging accurately differentiate hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from physiological and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy?
Cross-Sectional (n=129)
Yes
Does two-dimensional strain imaging accurately differentiate hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from physiological and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two-dimensional strain imaging provides excellent discriminatory ability to differentiate hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive and athletic left ventricular hypertrophy.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to examine the utility of two-dimensional strain (2DS) or speckle tracking imaging to typify functional adaptations of the left ventricle in variant forms of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Urban tertiary care academic medical centres. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 subjects, 56 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 34 with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (H-LVH), 27 professional athletes with LVH (AT-LVH) and 12 healthy controls in sinus rhythm with preserved left ventricular systolic function. METHODS: Conventional echocardiographic and tissue Doppler examinations were performed in all study subjects. Bi-dimensional acquisitions were analysed to map longitudinal systolic strain (automated function imaging, AFI, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) from apical views. RESULTS: Subjects with HCM had significantly lower regional and average global peak longitudinal systolic strain (GLS-avg) compared with controls and other forms of LVH. Strain dispersion index, a measure of regional contractile heterogeneity, was higher in HCM compared with the rest of the groups. On receiver operator characteristics analysis, GLS-avg had excellent discriminatory ability to distinguish HCM from H-LVH area under curve (AUC) (0.893, p<0.001) or AT-LVH AUC (0.920, p<0.001). Tissue Doppler and LV morphological parameters were better suited to differentiate the athlete heart from HCM. CONCLUSIONS: 2DS (AFI) allows rapid characterisation of regional and global systolic function and may have the potential to differentiate HCM from variant forms of LVH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afonso et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=129). Two-dimensional strain (2DS) imaging vs. Conventional echocardiography and tissue Doppler was evaluated on Discriminatory ability of average global peak longitudinal systolic strain (GLS-avg) to distinguish HCM from H-LVH or AT-LVH (AUC 0.893 and 0.920, p=<0.001). Two-dimensional strain imaging distinguished hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive LVH and athlete's heart.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: