Review examines ctDNA-MRD's prognostic utility in breast cancer subtypes, suggesting implications for monitoring and therapy.
Circulating tumor DNA-based molecular residual disease (ctDNA-MRD) provides prognostic information in early breast cancer, but its detection performance and clinical interpretation differ across molecular subtypes. This review examines subtype-specific ctDNA clearance, molecular re-emergence, and implications for neoadjuvant response assessment, postoperative surveillance, and MRD-directed trials. In ER-positive/HER2-negative disease, low shedding and late recurrence limit the negative predictive value of a single negative result, while the clinical utility of extended monitoring remains unproven. In HER2-positive disease, rapid clearance during neoadjuvant therapy may complement pathological complete response and residual cancer burden but does not independently determine adjuvant treatment. In triple-negative breast cancer, higher detectability and early recurrence strengthen the association between persistent or re-emergent ctDNA and short-term relapse risk. Across subtypes, ctDNA-MRD should complement clinicopathological and imaging assessment rather than independently guide treatment. Standardized assays and randomized intervention trials are required before routine clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: