Selective stellectomy prolongs epicardial ventricular refractoriness, while stellate ganglion stimulation decreases it, with varying magnitudes of excitability changes depending on the side manipulated.
Caution against human translation; leaves open whether left stellectomy reduces ventricular arrhythmia risk.
The effects of selective stellate ganglion stimulation or stellectomy on ventricular excitability were studied in 30 open chest mongrel dogs anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. The effective refractory period (ERP) and strength interval curves (stimulus intensity [S2] = twice the diastolic threshold [ERP], and 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 mA) were determined using bipolar epicardial electrodes placed in the mid-anterior wall of the right ventricle (RV) and the mid-posterolateral wall of the left ventricle (LV) during left stellate ganglion stimulation (LSGSt, n = 8) or right stellate ganglion stimulation (RSGSt, n = 8), or after left stellectomy (LSGEx, n = 7) or right stellectomy (RSGEx, n = 7). LSGEx prolonged ERP-LV (172 +/- 9 vs 167 +/- 8 msec, P < 0.05) and ERP-RV (163 +/- 10 vs 158 +/- 14 msec, P < 0.05). RSGEx prolonged ERP-LV (168 +/- 17 vs 162 +/- 15 msec, P < 0.01) and ERP-RV (166 +/- 14 vs 160 +/- 13 msec, P < 0.01), and the times of the strength interval curves obtained for each S2 intensity in both ventricles. LSGSt decreased ERP-LV (157 +/- 11 vs 163 +/- 12 msec, P < 0.01) and ERP-RV (147 +/- 18 vs 157 +/- 17 msec, P < 0.05), and the times of the strength interval curves obtained for each S2 intensity in both ventricles. RSGSt did not significantly decreased ERP-LV (152 +/- 11 vs 156 +/- 9 msec); however, it significantly shortened the times of the strength interval curves obtained for S2 intensities of 2 and 7 mA in the LV, and shortened ERP-RV (139 +/- 10 vs 145 +/- 7 msec, P < 0.01) and the times of the strength interval curve for S2 intensities of 2, 3, and 5 mA in the RV. A significant interaction (MANOVA test) was observed between the ventricle studied and the ganglion stimulated for S2 intensities of 2 and 3 mA, and between the effect of stimulation and the ganglion stimulated for S2 intensities of 3 and 14 mA. To conclude, selective stellectomy prolonged epicardial ventricular refractoriness in both the mid-anterior wall of the RV and the mid-posterolateral wall of the LV; the magnitude of the epicardial excitability variations in both areas was different during selective stellate ganglion stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia-Calvo et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: