Key result
One-month use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adolescents with type 1 diabetes improved brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation from 10.9% to 16.6% (p<0.005).
Why the study?
Does real-time continuous glucose monitoring improve glycaemic variability and endothelial function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes?
Observational (n=40)
Does real-time continuous glucose monitoring improve glycaemic variability and endothelial function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.6% vs 10.9%
p-value: p=< 0.005
Short-term use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adolescents with type 1 diabetes improves glycaemic variability and endothelial function, suggesting a potential role in early cardiovascular risk reduction.
Hypothesis-generating for CGM effects on endothelial function in T1D adolescents; should not yet change practice.
Children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) are the high-risk group of accelerated atherosclerosis. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) provides possibilities for the detection of glycaemic variability, newly recognized cardiovascular risk factor. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of RT-CGM as an educational tool to find and reduce glycaemic variability in order to improve endothelial function in T1DM adolescents. Forty patients aged 14.6 years were recruited. The study was based on one-month CGM sensors use. Parameters of glycaemic variability were analyzed during first and last sensor use, together with brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) to assess endothelial function. In the whole group, FMD improvement was found (10.9% to 16.6%, p < 0.005), together with decrease in all studied glycaemic variability parameters. In patients with HbA1c improvement compared to the group without HbA1c improvement, we found greater increase of FMD (12% to 19%, p < 0.005 versus 8.2% to 11.3%, p = 0.080) and greater improvement of glucose variability. RT-CGM can be considered as an additional tool that offers T1DM adolescents the quick reaction to decrease glycaemic variability in short time observation. Whether such approach might influence improvement in endothelial function and reduction of the risk of future cardiovascular disease remains to be elucidated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamiołkowska‐Sztabkowska et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Type 1 Diabetes (n=40). Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) (p=< 0.005). One-month use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adolescents with type 1 diabetes improved brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation from 10.9% to 16.6% (p<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: