Key result
In older transgender women referred to cardiology, the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD was 9.4% when calculated as male compared to 5.2% when calculated as female (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Reports of a high burden of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in transgender women have been based largely on surveys, leaving clinical prevalence and comorbidity data poorly described.
Cross-Sectional (n=52)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 9.4% vs 5.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Older transgender women referred to cardiology have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and ASCVD risk estimates vary significantly depending on the sex used for calculation, highlighting the need for standardized risk assessment in this population.
Risk estimates vary by sex assignment in transgender women; leaves open optimal calculator choice pending prospective validation.
Transgender women have been reported to have a high burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors based largely on surveys. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of CVD and associated comorbidities among a cohort of older transgender women referred to cardiology as part of their gender-affirming care. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of transgender women at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Fifty-two consecutive patients were included. The most common reasons for referral were cardiac risk factor management (45%) and pre-operative cardiac risk stratification prior to gender-affirming surgery (35%). The mean age was 57 ± 10 years, 87% were white, and 92% had insurance coverage. Forty-eight patients (92%) were taking gender-affirming hormone therapy; 5 had undergone breast augmentation, 4 had undergone orchiectomy, and 2 had undergone vaginoplasty. The most common comorbidities were depression and/or anxiety (63%), obesity (58%), and hyperlipidemia (54%). Excluding aldosterone antagonists, 46% were on cardiac medications; changes were recommended for 25% of patients: new prescriptions in 9, dose adjustments in 5, and discontinuations in 4. According to the pooled cohort equation, the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD was 9.4 ± 7.7% when the study population was calculated as male and 5.2 ± 5.1% when calculated as female (p <0.001). For patients who completed exercise testing, the functional aerobic capacity was fair (77.6 ± 21.4%) when calculated as male and average (99.5 ± 27.5%) as female (p < .0001); there was inconsistency in sex used for calculating the result on the formal report. Older transgender women may have an underestimated prevalence of CVD and its risk factors. More research is needed to identify cardiovascular health profiles, improve practice consistency, and establish normative values for transgender patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahowald et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=52). Transgender women was evaluated on 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD calculated as male vs female (p=<0.001). In older transgender women referred to cardiology, the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD was 9.4% when calculated as male compared to 5.2% when calculated as female (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: