Key result
Baseline dual BP and glycemic control is achieved in only ~10% of older hypertensive diabetics.
Why the study?
Hypertension and type 2 diabetes frequently coexist in older adults in China, but routine primary care remains largely single-disease oriented, leading to fragmented follow-up and poor integrated risk-factor control.
Does integrated comorbidity-oriented management improve 6-month simultaneous blood pressure and glycemic control in older adults with comorbid hypertension and type 2 diabetes compared to usual care?
RCT (n=1,010)
1:1 cluster randomization
Yes
Does integrated comorbidity-oriented management improve 6-month simultaneous blood pressure and glycemic control in older adults with comorbid hypertension and type 2 diabetes compared to usual care?
Baseline data from the COMPACT-HTDM trial demonstrates that older adults in Chinese primary care with comorbid hypertension and diabetes have severely low rates (9.5%) of simultaneous blood pressure and glycemic control, justifying the need for integrated management.
Baseline gaps in dual control signal need for integrated strategies in primary care; extends rationale for comorbidity-focused RCTs.
Background Hypertension and type 2 diabetes frequently coexist in older adults in China, yet routine primary care remains largely single-disease oriented, contributing to fragmented follow-up, medication complexity, and poor integrated risk-factor control. Objective To describe the design and baseline characteristics of COMPACT-HTDM, a trial evaluating integrated hypertension–diabetes management embedded in routine primary care. Methods COMPACT-HTDM is a pragmatic, two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial in three Jiangxi study areas, China. Twenty-four primary care institutions were randomized 1:1 to integrated comorbidity-oriented management or usual care. Eligible participants were adults aged 60 to 74 years with physician-diagnosed hypertension and type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months and recent chronic disease management. The intervention combines medication verification and safety management, monthly structured comorbidity follow-up, and health education with self-management support. The primary outcome is 6-month simultaneous blood pressure and glycemic control, defined as blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg and HbA1c <7.0%. Analyses will account for clustering. Results 1,010 participants completed baseline assessment: 504 in intervention clusters and 506 in usual-care clusters. Groups were well balanced. Mean age was 66.7 years, 578 participants (57.2%) were women, and 631 (62.5%) had primary school education or below. Despite common medication use and previous follow-up, only 188 (18.6%) had blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, 517 (51.2%) had HbA1c <7.0%, and 96 (9.5%) achieved dual control. Conclusions COMPACT-HTDM enrolled a pragmatic primary care population with low baseline dual control despite established service contact. The trial will evaluate whether integrated management improves cardiometabolic control and comorbidity-oriented service delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and type 2 diabetes (n=1,010). Integrated comorbidity-oriented management vs. Usual care was evaluated on 6-month simultaneous blood pressure and glycemic control (blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg and HbA1c <7.0%). Integrated comorbidity-oriented management is being evaluated in 1,010 older adults with hypertension and diabetes, of whom only 9.5% achieved baseline dual blood pressure and glycemic control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: