Key result
Long-term loop diuretic use in postmenopausal women increased urinary calcium and PTH, but after adjusting for body weight, bone mineral density did not differ from nonusers.
Why the study?
Does long-term treatment with loop diuretics affect calcium homeostasis and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women?
Cross-Sectional (n=280)
Does long-term treatment with loop diuretics affect calcium homeostasis and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women?
Effect estimate: +7.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Long-term loop diuretic use in postmenopausal women increases renal calcium loss, but this is compensated by a PTH-dependent mechanism, resulting in no major detrimental effect on bone mineral density.
May not warrant BMD monitoring in long-term users; leaves open fracture risk implications in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics (LD) are widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and disorders with fluid accumulation. LD are known to increase renal calcium losses and may thereby affect calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. OBJECTIVE: We studied to what extent long-term treatment with LD affects calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: In a cross-sectional design we compared 140 postmenopausal women treated with a LD for more than 2 years with 140 age-matched women not in diuretic therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with LD was associated with significantly increased urinary calcium, plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. Per 40 mg day(-1) of furosemide, urinary calcium was increased by 17% (P < 0.05) and plasma PTH levels were increased by 28% (P = 0.04). Users of LD had a 17% higher body weight (P < 0.001) compared with nonusers. This was due to a 32% higher fat mass (P < 0.001) and a 6% higher lean tissue mass (P < 0.001). Moreover, users of LD had a higher bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine (+7.5%, P < 0.001), hip (+4.8%, P = 0.004), forearm (+3.7%, P = 0.01) and whole body (+2.5%, P = 0.06). However, after adjustment for body weight differences, BMD did not differ between groups. Nevertheless, duration of LD treatment was positively associated with BMD at the spine (P = 0.03) and whole body (P < 0.05). BMD at the spine increases by 0.3% per 1 year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The increased renal calcium losses in users of LD are compensated for by a PTH-dependent increase in 1,25(OH)(2)D levels. Thereby calcium balance remains neutral without major effects on bone metabolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rejnmark et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Postmenopausal women (n=280). Loop diuretics vs. No diuretic therapy was evaluated on Bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine (unadjusted) (+7.5%, p=<0.001). Long-term loop diuretic use in postmenopausal women increased urinary calcium and PTH, but after adjusting for body weight, bone mineral density did not differ from nonusers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: