Key result
Dual-source CT demonstrated strong correlation with cine MRI for quantifying left ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.95) and volumes (r=0.96-0.99), with negligible bias for ejection fraction (0.72%).
Why the study?
Does dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution accurately assess left ventricular function compared to cine MRI in patients?
Observational (n=20)
Does dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution accurately assess left ventricular function compared to cine MRI in patients?
Dual-source CT provides accurate assessment of global and regional left ventricular function comparable to cine MRI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support dual-source CT for LV assessment when MRI unavailable; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
OBJECTIVE: Functional analysis using MDCT has been limited by insufficient temporal resolution. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a dual-source CT system with improved temporal resolution in the determination of both volume- or time-dependent functional parameters and regional wall motion in comparison with cine MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (15 of whom had previous myocardial infarction) were prospectively examined using dual-source CT. MRI was used as the standard of reference. Using the Simpson's method, ventricular volumes were determined for the whole of the cardiac cycle and results compared using Parson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Regional wall motion was assessed on cine images and compared using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Dual-source CT revealed a strong correlation with cine MRI regarding the quantification of end-diastolic volume (r = 0.98), end-systolic volume (r = 0.99), stroke volume (r = 0.96), and ejection fraction (r = 0.95). Good correlation was obtained for peak ejection rate (r = 0.79) and peak filling rate (r = 0.84), whereas agreement proved only moderate for time-to-peak ejection rate (r = 0.68) or time-to-peak filling rate from end-systole (r = 0.64). The mean difference for ejection fraction was negligible (bias, 0.72%). Good agreement between both techniques was likewise found for regional wall motion (kappa = 0.88). CONCLUSION: With the improvement of temporal resolution between 42 and 83 milliseconds, dual-source CT not only enables accurate assessment of global functional parameters, but it also allows for quantification of time-dependent variables and reliable evaluation of regional wall motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brodoefel et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Previous myocardial infarction (n=20). Dual-source CT vs. Cine MRI was evaluated on Quantification of end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction (r = 0.98 (EDV), r = 0.99 (ESV), r = 0.96 (SV), r = 0.95 (EF)). Dual-source CT demonstrated strong correlation with cine MRI for quantifying left ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.95) and volumes (r=0.96-0.99), with negligible bias for ejection fraction (0.72%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: