Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ZnWO 4 /Sb nanorods and r-GO-ZnWO 4 /Sb nanocomposite have been prepared using a single step solvothermal method. The prepared nanocomposites have been characterized using x-ray diffractometer (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscope (HR-TEM), Raman and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). The x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) technique was used to determine the elemental composition of ZWS-5 (5 mg r-GO-ZnWO 4 /Sb) composite. The XRD reveals the monoclinic wolframite structure of ZnWO 4 /Sb and r-GO-ZnWO 4 /Sb. SEM and HRTEM confirms that the ZnWO 4 /Sb has been decorated on the r-GO sheets. The electrochemical performance of the prepared samples towards the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) and dopamine sensing has been tested using electrochemical techniques. Onset potential of 265 mV @10 mA cm −2 , lower Tafel slope (95 mV dec −1 ), high electrochemical surface area (1383.216 m 2 g −1 ) and high specific site density (18.551 06 × 10 21 g −1 ) of ZWS-5 reveals the high electrocatalytic activity of the composite towards HER. Chronoamperometric dopamine sensing shows that ZWS-5 has the superior sensing performance with highest specific sensitivity (723 μ A μ M −1 μ g −1 ), lowest limit of detection (0.9624 μ M), along with a good selectivity. Results suggest that the r-GO-ZnWO 4 /Sb nanocomposite is a good candidate for the HER and electrochemical dopamine sensor. The incorporation of r-GO nanosheets with ZnWO 4 /Sb (ZWS) nanorods enhances the specific and electrochemical surface area, which accounts for the high electrocatalytic activity of the composite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brijesh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: