Key result
Personalized antithrombotic therapies after structural heart interventions are critical to balance postoperative thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Why the study?
Antithrombotic treatment after structural heart interventions must balance thromboembolic risk from prosthetic materials and altered hemodynamics against bleeding risk, necessitating personalized, evidence-based approaches.
This review highlights the importance of personalized, evidence-based antithrombotic strategies following structural heart interventions to balance thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Over the past 2 decades, structural heart interventions-including procedures like transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter mitral or tricuspid valve replacement, and transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral or tricuspid valve repair-have emerged as feasible alternatives to traditional surgery for treating valvular heart diseases. Antithrombotic treatment represents a critical aspect of postoperative care, aiming to balance the thromboembolic risk due to the incorporation of prosthetic materials and the consequently altered hemodynamics within the cardiac chambers with the bleeding risk depending on patients' and procedural factors. This continuously evolving interplay underscores the importance of personalized, evidence-based approaches to ensure optimal outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the current knowledge on antithrombotic therapies after structural interventions, offering insights into the evolving field and emphasizing the importance of tailored strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muro et al. (2024) conducted a review in Valvular heart disease. Antithrombotic therapies was evaluated. Personalized antithrombotic therapies after structural heart interventions are critical to balance postoperative thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: