Key result
The supine position during heavy exercise was associated with a greater amplitude of the slow component for VO2 and a reduced amplitude of the fast component compared to the upright position.
Why the study?
Does supine position alter pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise compared to upright position?
Does supine position alter pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise compared to upright position?
Supine position during heavy exercise alters VO2 kinetics by reducing the fast component amplitude and increasing the slow component amplitude, potentially due to an attenuated early heart rate response.
Supine positioning may confound VO2 kinetic interpretation in exercise testing; leaves open needs for mechanistic trials and protocol standardization.
It is presently unclear how the fast and slow components of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO(2)) kinetics would be altered by body posture during heavy exercise [i.e., above the lactate threshold (LT)]. Nine subjects performed transitions from unloaded cycling to work rates representing moderate (below the estimated LT) and heavy exercise (VO(2) equal to 50% of the difference between LT and peak VO(2)) under conditions of upright and supine positions. During moderate exercise, the steady-state increase in VO(2) was similar in the two positions, but VO(2) kinetics were slower in the supine position. During heavy exercise, the rate of adjustment of VO(2) to the 6-min value was also slower in the supine position but was characterized by a significant reduction in the amplitude of the fast component of VO(2), without a significant slowing of the phase 2 time constant. However, the amplitude of the slow component was significantly increased, such that the end-exercise VO(2) was the same in the two positions. The changes in VO(2) kinetics for the supine vs. upright position were paralleled by a blunted response of heart rate at 2 min into exercise during supine compared with upright heavy exercise. Thus the supine position was associated with not only a greater amplitude of the slow component for VO(2) but also, concomitantly, with a reduced amplitude of the fast component; this latter effect may be due, at least in part, to an attenuated early rise in heart rate in the supine position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koga et al. (1999) studied this question. Supine position during exercise vs. Upright position during exercise was evaluated on Oxygen uptake (VO2) kinetics. The supine position during heavy exercise was associated with a greater amplitude of the slow component for VO2 and a reduced amplitude of the fast component compared to the upright position.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: