Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on an innovative method of knowledge exchange with two third-sector organizations working with asylum migrants in Newcastle, UK, and Parma, Italy, we examine how each has reoriented what they consider as sanctuary-building work in response to repressive state asylum policies. This includes focusing on language and communication due to increasingly troubling anti-migration discourses that make the once unspeakable now speakable in both countries. Second, in response to different local government politics, they have sought different relationships with local institutions: autonomy in Parma and collaboration in Newcastle. The conclusion discusses how autonomous third-sector initiatives have more potential to build long-term sanctuary than those pursued through institutional collaboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Degnen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: