Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recombinant calreticulin and discrete domains of calreticulin were expressed in Escherichia coli, using the glutathione S-transferase fusion protein system, and their Ca2+ binding properties were determined. Native calreticulin bound 1 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein with high affinity, and also bound approximately 20 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein with low affinity. Both Ca2+ binding sites were present in the recombinant calreticulin indicating that proper folding of the protein was achieved using this system. Calreticulin is structurally divided into three distinct domains: the N-domain encompassing the first 200 residues; the P-domain which is enriched in proline residues (residue 187-317); and the C-domain which covers the carboxyl-terminal quarter of the protein (residues 310-401), and contains a high concentration of acidic residues. These domains were expressed in E. coli, isolated, and purified, and their Ca2+ binding properties were analyzed. The C-domain bound approximately 18 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein with a dissociation constant of approximately 2 mM. The P-domain bound approximately 0.6-1 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein with a dissociation constant of approximately 10 microM. The P-domain and the C-domain, when expressed together as the P+C-domain, bound Ca2+ with both high affinity and low affinity, reminiscent of both full length recombinant calreticulin and native calreticulin. In contrast the N-domain, did not bind any detectable amount of 45Ca2+. We conclude that calreticulin has two quite distinct types of Ca2+ binding sites, and that these sites are in different structural regions of the molecule. The P-domain binds Ca2+ with high affinity and low capacity, whereas the C-domain binds Ca2+ with low affinity and high capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baksh et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: