Key result
CIED implantation is linked to tricuspid regurgitation in up to ~45% of patients, worsening clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Cardiac implantable electronic device-induced tricuspid regurgitation is linked to worsening heart failure and increased mortality, necessitating better knowledge of its mechanical issues.
This mini-review synthesizes the mechanisms, diagnostic strategies (highlighting 3D echocardiography), and management options (medical, transvenous lead extraction, surgical, and transcatheter interventions) for CIED-induced tricuspid regurgitation, a condition linked to worsening heart failure and increased mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports monitoring for tricuspid regurgitation after CIED implantation; leaves open optimal prevention and management strategies.
The continuing application of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has led to an increasing concern regarding disturbances in the tricuspid valve (TV). The most prevalent TV issue related to lead implantation is tricuspid regurgitation. CIED-induced tricuspid regurgitation is associated with emerging or worsening preexisting heart failure and increased mortality rate. Because discontinuing the implantation of these instruments is not feasible, further knowledge of their mechanical problems may lead to advancements. This review addresses the available data regarding CIED-induced tricuspid regurgitation, elucidating its plausible pathomechanisms, diagnostic methods, and prospective treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amanda et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-induced tricuspid regurgitation. Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation was evaluated on CIED-associated tricuspid regurgitation. Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation is associated with a 7% to 45% prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation and increased risks of heart failure and mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: