Why the study?
Does orally administered SNAC heparin prevent venous thromboembolism as effectively as subcutaneous heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Does orally administered SNAC heparin prevent venous thromboembolism as effectively as subcutaneous heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Oral administration of heparin using the absorption enhancer SNAC appears effective and safe in early clinical trials for preventing venous thromboembolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports oral SNAC heparin feasibility; leaves open phase III confirmation before practice change.
The heparins, (unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH)) given by subcutaneous or intravenous injection have been used extensively in the prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolic disorders. The increasing use of the heparins, LMWHs in particular, in the out of hospital setting has stimulated interest in the development of orally absorbable antithrombotic agents that require little or no monitoring, and this includes the heparins. UFH or LMWH delivered orally has been shown to have an antithrombotic effect in animal thrombosis models although there is little change in plasma coagulation tests. The addition of a simple organic chemical N -(8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino)caprylate (SNAC) to UFH markedly enhances its absorption. A phase II study in patients undergoing total hip replacement indicated that SNAC heparin in two different doses was as effective and safe as UFH given subcutaneously. A phase III clinical trial comparing two doses of SNAC heparin given orally with LMWH by subcutaneous injection for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement is currently underway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineo et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: