Key result
Concomitant ischaemic ECG changes during a negative stress echocardiogram did not significantly increase cardiovascular events versus a normal stress ECG (HR 2.04; 95% CI 0.62-6.69; p=0.239).
Why the study?
Does the presence of ischaemic electrocardiographic changes worsen prognosis in patients with a negative peak supine bicycle stress echocardiography evaluated for chest pain?
Cohort (n=371)
Does the presence of ischaemic electrocardiographic changes worsen prognosis in patients with a negative peak supine bicycle stress echocardiography evaluated for chest pain?
Hazard Ratio: 2.04 (95% CI 0.62–6.69)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=0.239
A negative peak supine bicycle stress echocardiography confers an excellent long-term prognosis in patients evaluated for chest pain, regardless of concomitant ischaemic ECG changes.
BACKGROUND: a negative peak supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) was shown to have a long-term favourable prognostic value. Data on the long-term prognosis of ischaemic electrocardiographic (ISECG) changes in the setting of a negative peak supine bicycle ESE are lacking. DESIGN: we evaluated the prognostic value of negative peak supine bicycle ESE with or without concomitant ISECG changes in a referral population evaluated for chest pain after an inconclusive first-line work-up including clinical evaluation and exercise ECG stress. METHODS: from 2003 to 2010, patients who underwent a peak supine bicycle ESE and were deemed to be negative were evaluated. Two groups based on concomitant stress ECG tracing were analysed - those with normal stress ECG and those with ISECG changes. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularizations. RESULTS: a total of 371 patients (mean age 59.1 ± 12.1 years, 49.9% women) were studied. Of those, 141 (38.0%) had concomitant ISECG changes. Mean follow-up was 3.46 ± 1.76 years. The primary endpoint occurred in 3.0% of patients, (2.2% in those with normal stress ECG, and in 4.3% with ISECG changes, p = 0.251); with unadjusted hazard ratio for primary endpoint of 2.04 (95%CI 0.62-6.69, p = 0.239) in patients with ISECG changes compared to those with normal stress ECG. CONCLUSIONS: in an outpatient population without known CAD evaluated for chest pain after inconclusive first-line work-up, a negative peak supine bicycle ESE confers an excellent prognosis regardless of the nature of concomitant stress ECG abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbieri et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chest pain (n=371). Concomitant ischaemic electrocardiographic changes vs. Normal stress ECG was evaluated on Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularizations (HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.62-6.69, p=0.239). Concomitant ischaemic ECG changes during a negative stress echocardiogram did not significantly increase cardiovascular events versus a normal stress ECG (HR 2.04; 95% CI 0.62-6.69; p=0.239).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: