Key result
A military-civilian medical partnership at Vanderbilt University Medical Center successfully embedded military medical providers in a civilian trauma center to maintain combat casualty care skills.
Why the study?
Most military physicians lack consistent exposure to trauma or combat casualty care-relevant surgical cases at garrison military treatment facilities, creating a skills and experience gap.
A calculated, stepwise strategy with centralized leadership can lead to early success in military-civilian medical partnerships for trauma training.
May support military-civilian partnerships for skill sustainment; leaves open scalability and outcome impact.
One of the challenges in military medicine is ensuring that the medical force deployed to the theater of combat operations is prepared to perform life, limb, and eyesight saving care at a level of care comparable to our top civilian Level I trauma centers. There is increasingly more evidence demonstrating that the majority of military physicians are not exposed to trauma or combat casualty care-relevant surgical cases on a consistent basis in their daily practice at their garrison military treatment facility (MTF). To prevent this widening skills and experience gap from become more of a reality, the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act called for the expansion of military and civilian (Mil-Civ) medical partnerships, working toward embedding military medical providers and surgical teams in busy civilian trauma centers. Vanderbilt University Medical Center is one of the busiest trauma centers in the country and being in close proximity to the local MTF at Fort Campbell, KY, it is primed to become one of the premier Mil-Civ partnerships. Creating a strategy that builds the partnership in a calculated and stepwise fashion through multiple avenues with centralized leadership has resulted in the early success of the program. However, Vanderbilt University Medical Center is not immune to challenges similar to those at other Mil-Civ partnerships, but only by sharing best practices can we continue to make progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stinner et al. (2022) studied Military medical training and trauma care readiness. Military and civilian (Mil-Civ) medical partnerships was evaluated. A military-civilian medical partnership at Vanderbilt University Medical Center successfully embedded military medical providers in a civilian trauma center to maintain combat casualty care skills.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: