Key result
Polio immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone increased from 48.7% in 2008 to 77.1% in 2013, but declined to 61.2% in 2019, with significant subnational inequalities persisting.
Why the study?
Polio continues to pose a risk to young children globally and vaccination reach is not always equal, prompting an evaluation of socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in polio immunisation coverage in Sierra Leone.
Cross-Sectional (n=4,613)
Polio immunization coverage in Sierra Leone fluctuated between 2008 and 2019, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in underserved regions to address persistent subnational inequalities.
Subnational inequalities drive polio coverage gaps in Sierra Leone; leaves open whether targeted regional strategies improve equity in similar settings.
BACKGROUND: Polio, a debeilitating and potentially life-threatening disease, continues to pose a risk to young children globally. While vaccination offers a powerful shield, its reach is not always equal. This study explores socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in polio immunisation coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone between 2008 and 2019. METHODS: The study utilised data from the Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey rounds conducted in 2008, 2013, and 2019 to examine polio immunization coverage among two-year-olds. The World Health Organisation Health Equity Assessment Toolkit software calculated various inequality measures, including simple difference, ratio, population-attributable risk, and population-attributable fraction. An inequality assessment was conducted for six stratifiers: maternal age, maternal economic status, maternal level of education, place of residence, sex of the child, and sub-national region. RESULTS: Polio immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone increased from 48.7% in 2008 to 77.1% in 2013, then declined to 61.2% in 2019. No significant inequalities were observed based on maternal age, child's sex or maternal educational level. Coverage was higher among children of mothers from the poorest households, and in rural areas. However, the main inequality identified was subnational inequality. CONCLUSION: The initial increase in coverage followed by a decline underscores the need for sustained efforts to maintain and improve immunization rates, particularly in the Western, Northwestern, and Northern provinces, where significant subnational inequalities exist. The absence of disparities related to maternal age, child sex, and education suggests that traditional demographic factors may not be the primary barriers to immunization; instead, geographic and socioeconomic contexts play a more pivotal role. This indicates that targeted interventions should focus on improving access to vaccination services in underserved areas, potentially through community outreach and mobile vaccination units. Additionally, the better coverage among children of poorer mothers and those in rural areas highlights the importance of understanding local dynamics and leveraging community strengths to enhance immunization uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osborne et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Polio immunization coverage (n=4,613). Socioeconomic and geographical factors vs. Reference demographic groups was evaluated on Polio immunization coverage. Polio immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone increased from 48.7% in 2008 to 77.1% in 2013, but declined to 61.2% in 2019, with significant subnational inequalities persisting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: