Key result
Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure from 5 to 10 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients decreased baroreflex gain from 1.94 to 1.13 ms/mmHg (p=0.005) and increased cardiorespiratory stability.
Why the study?
Does increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O alter breathing cardiovascular variability and baroreflex gain in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury?
Observational (n=23)
No
Does increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O alter breathing cardiovascular variability and baroreflex gain in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.13% vs 1.94%
p-value: p=0.005
Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury decreases baroreflex sensitivity and promotes stability of HF-RR amplitude, reflecting a blunted autonomic nervous function.
May warrant autonomic monitoring during PEEP titration in ventilated ALI; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Baroreflex allows to reduce sudden rises or falls of arterial pressure through parallel RR interval fluctuations induced by autonomic nervous system. During spontaneous breathing, the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may affect the autonomic nervous system, as suggested by changes in baroreflex efficiency and RR variability. During mechanical ventilation, some patients have stable cardiorespiratory phase difference and high-frequency amplitude of RR variability (HF-RR amplitude) over time and others do not. Our first hypothesis was that a steady pattern could be associated with reduced baroreflex sensitivity and HF-RR amplitude, reflecting a blunted autonomic nervous function. Our second hypothesis was that PEEP, widely used in critical care patients, could affect their autonomic function, promoting both steady pattern and reduced baroreflex sensitivity. METHODS: We tested the effect of increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O on the breathing variability of arterial pressure and RR intervals, and on the baroreflex. Invasive arterial pressure, ECG and ventilatory flow were recorded in 23 mechanically ventilated patients during 15 minutes for both PEEP levels. HF amplitude of RR and systolic blood pressure (SBP) time series and HF phase differences between RR, SBP and ventilatory signals were continuously computed by complex demodulation. Cross-spectral analysis was used to assess the coherence and gain functions between RR and SBP, yielding baroreflex-sensitivity indices. RESULTS: At PEEP 10, the 12 patients with a stable pattern had lower baroreflex gain and HF-RR amplitude of variability than the 11 other patients. Increasing PEEP was generally associated with a decreased baroreflex gain and a greater stability of HF-RR amplitude and cardiorespiratory phase difference. Four patients who exhibited a variable pattern at PEEP 5 became stable at PEEP 10. At PEEP 10, a stable pattern was associated with higher organ failure score and catecholamine dosage. CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation, stable HF-RR amplitude and cardiorespiratory phase difference over time reflect a blunted autonomic nervous function which might worsen as PEEP increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louw et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Acute lung injury requiring mechanical ventilation (n=23). Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) increase to 10 cm H2O vs. PEEP 5 cm H2O was evaluated on Baroreflex gain (ms/mmHg) (p=0.005). Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure from 5 to 10 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients decreased baroreflex gain from 1.94 to 1.13 ms/mmHg (p=0.005) and increased cardiorespiratory stability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: