Methodological review demonstrates an alignment framework for domain-level ontologies in materials science, highlighting improved cross-domain data integration.
The growing complexity and interdisciplinary nature of Materials Science research demand efficient data management and exchange through structured knowledge representation. Domain-Level Ontologies (DLOs) for Materials Science have emerged as a valuable tool for describing materials properties, processes, and structures, enabling effective data integration, interoperability, and knowledge discovery. However, the harmonization of DLOs, and, more generally, the establishment of fully interoperable multi-level ecosystems, remains a challenge due to various factors, including the diverse landscape of existing ontologies. This work provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in DLOs for Materials Science, highlighting their main features and purposes. More than 40 DLOs in Materials Science are considered. Furthermore, an alignment methodology including both manual and automated steps, making use of Top-Level Ontologies’ (TLO) capability of promoting interoperability, and revolving around the engineering of FAIR standalone entities acting as minimal data pipelines (“bridge concepts”), is presented. A proof of concept is also provided. The primary aspiration of this undertaking is to make a meaningful contribution towards the establishment of a unified ontology framework for Materials Science, facilitating more effective data integration and fostering interoperability across Materials Science subdomains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baas et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: