Key result
Cystatin-C based GFR showed a stronger inverse correlation with trough dabigatran concentration (R=-0.79) compared to creatinine based GFR (R=-0.71).
Why the study?
Does GFR estimation using cystatin-C better correlate with trough dabigatran concentrations compared to creatinine-based GFR in patients treated with dabigatran?
Observational (n=77)
Does GFR estimation using cystatin-C better correlate with trough dabigatran concentrations compared to creatinine-based GFR in patients treated with dabigatran?
Effect estimate: R=-0.79 for GFR-CYS vs R=-0.71 for GFR-CRE
Cystatin-C based GFR estimation shows a slightly stronger correlation with dabigatran trough concentrations than creatinine-based GFR, though neither fully explains individual pharmacokinetic variations.
Cystatin-C GFR may better estimate dabigatran exposure; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Dabigatran (DAB) is 80 % renally excreted. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is recommended to evaluate the kidney function for DAB dosage adjusting. In this paper we report same results about evaluation of creatinine (CRE) GFR and cystatin-C (CYS) GFR in comparison with drug concentration in a group of patients treated with DAB. We considered 77 patients in which an evaluation of kidney function using CRE and CYS based GFR was performed. After GFR-CRE and GFR-CYS calculation these patients were classified as recommended by KDIGO guidelines. Moreover we evaluated the relationship between trough DAB concentration and GFR-CRE or GFR-CYS. We observed a satisfactory correlation between GFR-CRE and GFR-CYS ( $R=0.85$ ). Following KDIGO criteria, patients’ classification performed by using GFR-CRE or GFR-CYS was concordant in 52 (68 %) subjects and discordant in 25 (32 %). We observed an inverse relationship between trough DAB concentration versus GFR-CRE ( $R=-0.71$ ) and GFR-CYS ( $R=-0.79$ ). Results obtained in this study, although preliminary, suggested that, in this particular subset of patients, the determination of GFR-CYS can be a better renal function indicator than GFR-CRE. Moreover, we observed that GFR evaluation alone is not able to explain in a satisfactory manner, individual responses to dabigatran etexilate evaluated as a trough DAB concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gessoni et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Patients treated with dabigatran (n=77). Cystatin-C based GFR (GFR-CYS) vs. Creatinine based GFR (GFR-CRE) was evaluated on Relationship between trough dabigatran concentration and GFR estimates (R=-0.79 for GFR-CYS vs R=-0.71 for GFR-CRE). Cystatin-C based GFR showed a stronger inverse correlation with trough dabigatran concentration (R=-0.79) compared to creatinine based GFR (R=-0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: