Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In general, a 1 — α confidence region C(X) for a parameter θ ∈ Θ yields a test at level a for H: θ ∈ Θ H versus K: θ ∈ ΘC H whenever we reject if C(X) ∪ ΘH = θ. We show under certain equivariance properties of C(X) that for the case of convex alternatives, ΘC H, the level of the resulting test is in fact α/2. This extends recent findings for hyperrectangular alternatives as they occur in the multivariate bioequivalence problem. Furthermore, we apply the suggested test to ellipsoid-type alternatives instead of hyperrectangulars in the multivariate bioequivalence problem and to a problem occurring in neurophysiology. Finally, we compare our test numerically with existing methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munk et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: