Key result
Historical 1958 review links nutrition to atherosclerosis, relying heavily on self-citation without clinical trial data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This is the second monograph concerned with atherosclerosis from the Medical Research Institute of Michael Reese Hospital. Like the first, its value rests especially in the list of references—a nearly complete register of the scientific literature dealing with atherogenesis to the middle of 1958; the earlier monograph had carried them as far as 1953. Beyond this catalogue of references the monograph has some serious limitations. The authors tend to be preoccupied with their own publications. This is understandable, but when, as often happens, the authors cite one of their own reviews as a source which is as readily available in its original form I think they do an unscholarly thing. Most scientists will not need these authors for interpreters. The authors begin with a statement of a theory that is, frankly, a corker. It is, in the first place, a monumental problem for grammarians—"the nutritional-metabolic cholesterol-lipid-lipoprotein theory of atherogenesis." This
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven R. Dayton (1959) studied Atherosclerosis. Nutrition was evaluated. Nutrition and atherosclerosis are reviewed in this 1958 monograph, which catalogs literature since 1953 but lacks clinical trial data and relies heavily on self-citation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: