Comparative analysis reveals performance metric deficiencies in supervisory authorities, highlighting the necessity of stakeholder-driven indexes to mitigate corruption.
A new index for assessing the performance indicators of supervisory authorities (SA) is developed, based on an analysis of the existing assessment system. The hypothesis was tested about the presence of parallel operating key performance indicators (KPI) systems of the SA, which do not focus on assessing the level of protection of protected values and do not give a clear idea of the quality of the work of the SA, and are not aimed at minimizing corruption risks. The approaches to improving the methodology for assessing commissions are developed, taking into account the positions of business, citizens, and experts as the most important sources of feedback when assessing the activities of commissions. This will make it possible to make adjustments to the further activities of the SA (including anti-corruption ones) based on the data received. The research methodology involves analytical and comparative legal approaches. The authors’ concept of a new assessment index of the indicators of KPI of the SA is presented, including an analysis of its advantages and limitations, as well as of the prospects for implementing the index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Крылова et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: