Key result
Anosognosia with neglect after stroke is linked to better perceived quality of life despite more falls.
Observational (n=60)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anosognosia and neglect may coexist in stroke patients. Neglect patients often report poor quality of life (QOL), whereas patients suffering from other cognition disorders with poor insight report better QOL. This study investigates the relationship between anosognosia, neglect and QOL amongst stroke survivors. METHODS: Stroke survivors who met the criteria were used as a sampling pool. Sixty stroke patients were observed in this study, amongst whom 20 patients with anosognosia and neglect (A+N+), 20 patients with neglect but not anosognosia (A-N+) and 20 patients with neither anosognosia nor neglect (A-N-) were selected from the sampling pool based on demographic characteristics matched with the A+N+ group. A questionnaire (SS-QOL) was used to collect the QOL perceived by the stroke survivors. RESULTS: The perceived QOL of the A+N+ group was significantly better than those of the other groups, including the subscales of self-care, mobility, work/productivity, upper extremity, mood, family role and social role. However, the A+N+ group had poor balance level and more fall incidents were reported. CONCLUSION: The A+N+ group perceived better QOL but had more falls and poorer balance than the other groups. Health providers should work with caregivers aggressively in preventing accidents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Right hemisphere stroke (n=60). Coexisting anosognosia and neglect (A+N+) vs. Neglect without anosognosia (A-N+) and neither anosognosia nor neglect (A-N-) was evaluated on Perceived quality of life (SS-QOL). Stroke survivors with both anosognosia and neglect (n=20) reported significantly better perceived quality of life than matched control groups (n=40), despite poorer balance and more fall incidents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: