Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose:This methodologicalstudywas done to developaNursing CompetencyMeasurement Scale based onthe clinical laddersof nursesworking inwards. Methods:Thirty clinical experts and501wardnursesevaluated thecon- tentvalidityofthescale.A surveyusingtheNursingCompetencyMeasurement Scalewasconductedwith114nurses toevaluatereliabilityandapplicabilityoftheinstrument.DatawereanalyzedusingSPSS/WIN 21.0.Results:A review ofthe literatureidentified13componentsof nursingcompetenciesand30core nursingcompetenciesbased oneach ofthe4gradeclinicalladders. Cronbach's coefficientforthetotalwas.92.Cronbach ⍺ 's reliabilitiesofeachclinical ⍺ laddergradewere.83for GradeⅠ,.84forGradeⅡ,.81forGrade Ⅲ,and.84for GradeⅣ. TheContentValidityIndex (CVI) of the scale with 120 individual items was 0.976~1.000 for GradeⅠscale, 0.986~1.000 for Grade Ⅱ scale, 0.984~1.000 for Grade scale, and 0.992~1.000 for Grade scale. The expert group nurses Ⅲ Ⅳ ' average degree of nursingcompetencemeasuredusingthescalewas3.38~3.75out of 4.0. Conclusion:Throughthisprocess, 120final questionswereconfirmedtorepresentitemsoftheNursingCompetencyMeasurementScalebasedonclinicalgrade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: