Key result
Ultrasound significantly underestimated the cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve compared to direct casting and histology (1.5 vs. 3.1 vs. 2.3 mm2), indicating a biased estimation of nerve size.
Why the study?
Cuff electrodes for vagus nerve stimulation can cause side effects or fail if improperly sized, and it remains unclear how precisely preoperative ultrasound reflects cervical vagus nerve dimensions.
Does high-resolution ultrasound accurately reflect the true cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve compared to casting and histology?
Observational (n=12)
Single-blind
No
Does high-resolution ultrasound accurately reflect the true cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve compared to casting and histology?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.5% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=≤0.02
Ultrasound consistently underestimates the cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve compared to in situ casting, which may lead to inappropriate sizing of cuff electrodes for vagus nerve stimulation.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has become a promising therapy especially for drug resistant epilepsy and other pathologies. Side effects or missing therapeutic success are observed due to cuff electrodes that are too narrow or too wide. Preoperative high-resolution ultrasound is used to evaluate the size of the cervical vagus nerve (CVN) to estimate the size of cuff electrodes for VNS. It remains unclear how precise ultrasound reflects the CVN dimensions, which has been the objective of this study. CVN cross-sections and diameters were investigated in 23 sides from 12 bodies, using ultrasound, histology, and CVN casting in situ as a reference. Morphometric data were obtained including fascicle count and nerve composition in histology. CVN yielded significant side-, age-, and BMI-related differences. CVN cross-sections were smaller in ultrasound when compared to casting and histology (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 0.7 mm 2 ). With the given setting in ultrasound, CVN cross-sections were consistently underestimated when compared to casting. Ultrasound-based cross-section measurements are related to a biased estimation of CVN size. A factor to correct for method related differences may help to adjust for accurate cuff electrode sizes for patient needs and to reduce undesired effects and potentially material consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dörschner et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Post-mortem bodies (evaluation for vagus nerve stimulation) (n=12). Ultrasound measurement vs. Direct casting and histology was evaluated on Cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve (p=≤0.02). Ultrasound significantly underestimated the cross-sectional area of the cervical vagus nerve compared to direct casting and histology (1.5 vs. 3.1 vs. 2.3 mm2), indicating a biased estimation of nerve size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: