Why the study?
Does surgical repair with concomitant aneurysmectomy improve survival in patients with ventricular septal rupture and ventricular aneurysm post-myocardial infarction?
Does surgical repair with concomitant aneurysmectomy improve survival in patients with ventricular septal rupture and ventricular aneurysm post-myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surgical repair with concomitant aneurysmectomy is advised for post-MI ventricular septal rupture and ventricular aneurysm, ideally performed electively three months after rupture or when nonoperative treatment fails.
A successful surgical repair of a ruptured ventricular septum and resection of a left-ventricular aneurysm secondary to myocardial infarction was performed on a 76-year-old man. A review of the literature reveals that eight other patients with ventricular septal rupture and ventricular aneurysm underwent surgical treatment. Longer survival and better results correlated somewhat with younger age, higher systemic cardiac output, higher pulmonary artery pressure, concomitant aneurysmectomy, and an interval of three months or more between septal rupture and its repair. However, notable exceptions to each situation exist. The data suggest that patients with these complications undergo surgical treatment when nonoperative treatment is no longer effective; otherwise, elective repair should be carried out three months after the rupture. In either case, concomitant aneurysmectomy is advised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George R. Daicoff (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: