Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article conceptualises the revolutionary situation that gripped Zimbabwe from the late 1990s. That was the moment in which the two political questions that historically have galvanized peripheral capitalism – the agrarian and the national – were returned to the forefront of political life. We argue that the revolutionary situation resulted neither in a revolution, nor in mediocre reformism, nor in restoration. It resulted in an interrupted revolution, marked by a radical agrarian reform and a radicalised state – the first on the continent since the end of the Cold War.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moyo et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: