Key result
Cluster analysis of high-cost high-need Medicaid patients identified six clinically distinct subgroups with varying healthcare utilization patterns, such as pregnancy complications and behavioral health.
Why the study?
Complex case management programs have had limited success in Medicaid, potentially because typical high-cost high-need designations aggregate clinically diverse subgroups.
Observational (n=484,328)
Yes
Clustering identifies clinically distinct high-cost high-need Medicaid subgroups with varying utilization; leaves open whether segmentation improves case management.
BACKGROUND: High-cost high-need patients are typically defined by risk or cost thresholds which aggregate clinically diverse subgroups into a single 'high-need high-cost' designation. Programs have had limited success in reducing utilization or improving quality of care for high-cost high-need Medicaid patients, which may be due to the underlying clinical heterogeneity of patients meeting high-cost high-need designations. METHODS: Our objective was to segment a population of high-cost high-need Medicaid patients (N = 676,161) eligible for a national complex case management program between January 2012 and May 2015 to disaggregate clinically diverse subgroups. Patients were eligible if they were in the top 5 % of annual spending among UnitedHealthcare Medicaid beneficiaries. We used k-means cluster analysis, identified clusters using an information-theoretic approach, and named clusters using the patients' pattern of acute and chronic conditions. We assessed one-year overall and preventable hospitalizations, overall and preventable emergency department (ED) visits, and cluster stability. RESULTS: Six clusters were identified which varied by utilization and stability. The characteristic condition patterns were: 1) pregnancy complications, 2) behavioral health, 3) relatively few conditions, 4) cardio-metabolic disease, and complex illness with relatively 5) low or 6) high resource use. The patients varied by cluster by average ED visits (2.3-11.3), hospitalizations (0.3-2.0), and cluster stability (32-91%). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that disaggregating subgroups of high-cost high-need patients in a large multi-state Medicaid sample identified clinically distinct clusters of patients who may have unique clinical needs. Segmenting previously identified high-cost high-need populations thus may be a necessary strategy to improve the effectiveness of complex case management programs in Medicaid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quinton et al. (2021) conducted an observational in High-cost high-need Medicaid patients (n=484,328). Clinical segmentation (cluster analysis) was evaluated on Identification of clinically distinct clusters and their healthcare utilization. Cluster analysis of high-cost high-need Medicaid patients identified six clinically distinct subgroups with varying healthcare utilization patterns, such as pregnancy complications and behavioral health.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: